Your Retirement Corpus by Age: Pre-Tax vs. Post-Tax
By WealthyDesis Team · August 7, 2026
Fidelity’s widely cited retirement savings benchmark says to have 1x your salary saved by 30, 3x by 40, 6x by 50, 8x by 60, and 10x by 67 — a target built on saving 15% of income (including employer match) starting at age 25 and retiring at 67. That’s a useful compass, but it doesn’t answer the question that matters more for this audience specifically: pre-tax or Roth, and does the answer change if you’re not sure you’ll still be a U.S. resident when you actually retire?
The benchmark, and where it comes from
Fidelity’s savings factors assume a saver starts contributing 15% of income (employer match included) at age 25, invests more than half their portfolio in stocks on average over their career, retires at 67, and wants to maintain their pre-retirement lifestyle using savings plus Social Security. Under those assumptions, the age-based milestones are:
| Age | Target (multiple of current salary) |
|---|---|
| 30 | 1x |
| 40 | 3x |
| 50 | 6x |
| 60 | 8x |
| 67 | 10x |
These are aspirational goalposts, not a formula you can derive your own number from — Fidelity is explicit that individual circumstances (retirement age, desired lifestyle, other income sources, whether you started saving later than 25) shift the right target considerably. What the table is useful for is a gut check: if you’re 40 and nowhere near 3x your salary saved, that’s a signal to increase your savings rate or push out your retirement timeline, not a verdict.
What 15% actually builds — a worked example
Starting to save early matters more than almost any other lever in this calculation, because most of the eventual balance comes from investment growth compounding on itself, not from the contributions themselves. Take a $90,000 starting salary at age 25, a 15% savings rate, and a 7% average annual nominal return — a commonly used long-run assumption for a diversified stock-heavy portfolio:
| Age | Contributions to date | Balance |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | $67,500 (5 years) | ~$82,000 |
| 40 | $180,000 (15 years, salary growing) | ~$405,000 |
| 50 | $315,000 (25 years, salary growing) | ~$1,125,000 |
By age 40, contributions account for less than half the balance — investment growth has already overtaken new money as the bigger driver. That gap only widens from there, which is also why the Fidelity benchmarks jump by such large multiples in the second half of a career (6x at 50 to 10x at 67): each additional year of growth is compounding on a much larger base than it was a decade earlier. (These figures use nominal — not inflation-adjusted — dollars and a fixed 7% return for simplicity; actual returns vary year to year, and Fidelity’s own benchmark table uses a more conservative blended assumption that accounts for that variance, which is part of why a simple compounding model like this one will drift from their published multiples at older ages even when it lines up closely in the first 10-15 years.)
Run your own numbers
4% is the traditional starting-point estimate from U.S. historical market data — not a guarantee, and it assumes a 30-year retirement horizon.
Target nest egg needed
—
Projected balance at retirement age
—
—
Educational estimate, not financial advice — this ignores taxes, inflation on your contribution growth, Social Security (which most H1B-to-green-card holders can still qualify for with 40 work credits), and any pension. Run it again on a lower expected return to stress-test the plan.
Projected balance
—
Total contributed
—
Growth from starting amount
—
Growth from contributions
—
—
Educational estimate, not investment advice — a fixed annual return smooths over real market volatility, and it ignores taxes, fees, and inflation, all of which reduce real purchasing power.
Pre-tax vs. Roth: the split that’s easy to get wrong
The standard framing — pre-tax now if you expect a lower tax bracket in retirement, Roth now if you expect a higher one — assumes you’ll be a U.S. tax resident when you withdraw. For a lot of H-1B and green card-track holders, that assumption isn’t safe. Visa timelines, family circumstances, and the possibility of returning to India before or at retirement age are real enough that the standard advice deserves a second look.
The difference matters because the two account types are treated very differently for a nonresident alien. Distributions from a traditional 401(k) or IRA paid to someone who is a nonresident alien for U.S. tax purposes are subject to a default 30% U.S. withholding rate under IRC Section 1441 — reduced only if a tax treaty specifically applies and the right paperwork (Form W-8BEN, sometimes Form 8833) is filed with the plan administrator, and even then a full refund of over-withheld amounts usually still requires filing a nonresident U.S. tax return. Roth accounts are funded with money that’s already been taxed, so a nonresident alien withdrawing their own Roth contributions generally doesn’t face that same 30% withholding on the contribution portion, though qualified-distribution rules for the earnings portion still apply. For a deeper look at exactly what changes if you leave the U.S. permanently, see the companion article on 401(k)/IRA treatment after moving back to India — this section is about how that possibility should factor into the pre-tax/Roth split you choose today, not the mechanics of a distribution you might take decades from now.
None of this means Roth is automatically the right call — if your marginal tax rate today is high (many mid-career tech salaries land in the 22-24% federal bracket or higher before state tax), the immediate deduction from a traditional contribution is worth real money now, and a partial-return scenario doesn’t erase that trade-off. It means the decision has an extra variable most retirement content doesn’t mention: genuine uncertainty about where you’ll be a tax resident when you eventually withdraw is itself a reason to split contributions across both account types rather than committing entirely to one, so you have flexibility either way the future plays out.
2026 contribution limits — and a new rule that affects higher earners
For 2026, the employee 401(k) deferral limit is $24,500, the combined employee-plus-employer limit is $72,000, and the IRA contribution limit is $7,500. The standard catch-up contribution for those 50 and older is $8,000 (a $11,250 “super catch-up” applies specifically to ages 60-63).
New for 2026, and directly relevant to higher earners in this audience: if your FICA (Social Security) wages exceeded $150,000 in 2025, any catch-up contributions you make in 2026 must go into a Roth account — pre-tax catch-up contributions are no longer an option once you cross that threshold. It’s a mandatory rule, not a choice, and it only affects the catch-up portion (the amount above the standard $24,500 limit), not your regular contributions.
What happens if this is mismanaged
- Contributing 100% pre-tax with real uncertainty about retiring outside the U.S.: a large traditional 401(k)/IRA balance faces 30% default withholding if you’re a nonresident alien when you withdraw — a gap a treaty may or may not close, and one you’d need to actively file paperwork to reduce.
- Ignoring the 2026 high-earner Roth catch-up rule: if you earned over $150,000 in FICA wages in 2025 and your plan still routes your catch-up contribution to pre-tax by default, the excess is treated as taxed income you’ll owe tax on twice unless corrected before the plan’s deadline — check with your plan administrator directly rather than assuming your elections carried over correctly.
- Starting to save “later” because a Fidelity multiple looks unreachable: the worked example above shows why that’s the costliest possible reaction — a dollar not saved at 25 doesn’t get 40+ years to compound, and no later contribution can fully replace it.
- Treating the salary-multiple benchmark as a hard target: it assumes a 67 retirement age and a specific savings-rate history; if you started saving later, plan to retire earlier, or expect a different lifestyle, the multiple that actually matters for you is different from the table — run your own numbers with the tools above rather than panicking (or relaxing) based on the generic figure.
If your specific plan is to leave the U.S. before or at retirement, read the companion article on what happens to your 401(k) and IRA if you move back to India before deciding how to split future contributions — the pre-tax/Roth choice above and the withdrawal mechanics there are two halves of the same decision.
Frequently asked questions
How much should I have saved for retirement by age 40?
Fidelity's widely cited benchmark is 3 times your annual salary by age 40, based on saving 15% of income (including employer match) starting at 25 and retiring at 67. It's a planning goalpost, not a pass/fail test — your actual target depends on your retirement age, expected lifestyle, and other income sources.
Should H1B holders prioritize Roth or traditional 401(k) contributions?
It depends heavily on whether you expect to retire in the US or eventually return to India. Traditional (pre-tax) contributions defer tax until withdrawal, which is straightforward if you'll be a U.S. resident when you withdraw. If there's real uncertainty about your country of residence at retirement, that changes the calculus — nonresident alien withdrawals face default 30% U.S. withholding, and the two account types are treated very differently in that scenario.
What's new for retirement contribution limits in 2026?
The 401(k) employee deferral limit rises to $24,500, the combined employee+employer limit rises to $72,000, and the IRA limit rises to $7,500. New for 2026: if you earned over $150,000 in FICA wages in 2025, any catch-up contributions you make this year must go into a Roth account, not pre-tax.
Written by WealthyDesis Team
Reviewed for accuracy against current IRS and USCIS guidance at time of publishing.
More in Retirement & Tax-Advantaged Accounts